Which will read something like.. "stay six feet apart and wear a face mask!"
And for the love of pete GET VACCINATED


Presidents do not 'set guidelines' for the public, though. Unless you are implying this would be some kind of executive order...CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:06 amSo it appears that biden will finally give a state of the union address where it is said that he'll announce some sort of 'victory' over covid and put in place new guidelines for the public to follow in the event of nuclear fallout...
Which will read something like.. "stay six feet apart and wear a face mask!"you literally can't make this shit up!!
And for the love of pete GET VACCINATED![]()

Yeah, they don't shut down viruses eitherStringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:39 amPresidents do not 'set guidelines' for the public, though. Unless you are implying this would be some kind of executive order...CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:06 amSo it appears that biden will finally give a state of the union address where it is said that he'll announce some sort of 'victory' over covid and put in place new guidelines for the public to follow in the event of nuclear fallout...
Which will read something like.. "stay six feet apart and wear a face mask!"you literally can't make this shit up!!
And for the love of pete GET VACCINATED![]()

Right, which is why Biden has never said that he did.CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:02 pmYeah, they don't shut down viruses eitherStringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:39 amPresidents do not 'set guidelines' for the public, though. Unless you are implying this would be some kind of executive order...CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:06 amSo it appears that biden will finally give a state of the union address where it is said that he'll announce some sort of 'victory' over covid and put in place new guidelines for the public to follow in the event of nuclear fallout...
Which will read something like.. "stay six feet apart and wear a face mask!"you literally can't make this shit up!!
And for the love of pete GET VACCINATED![]()

StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:19 pmCatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:02 pm
Uhh, yeah he didhttps://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/biden ... 4942277643

"I'll put in place a plan to deal with this pandemic responsibly... I'm going to shut down the virus" - October 2020CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:48 pm Uhh, yeah he didhttps://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/biden ... 4942277643

StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:02 pm"I'll put in place a plan to deal with this pandemic responsibly... I'm going to shut down the virus" - October 2020CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:48 pm Uhh, yeah he didhttps://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/biden ... 4942277643
Not sure what part of this is 'Joe Biden claiming victory over COVID' but I watched the whole video.
But even if he did claim what you suggest, it wouldn't matter, since Joe Biden is not in charge of the international scientific community, and doesn't dictate what guidelines are recommended.

Why don't you address the discussion instead of hurling veiled insults?CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:07 pmStringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 1:02 pm"I'll put in place a plan to deal with this pandemic responsibly... I'm going to shut down the virus" - October 2020CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 12:48 pm Uhh, yeah he didhttps://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/biden ... 4942277643
Not sure what part of this is 'Joe Biden claiming victory over COVID' but I watched the whole video.
But even if he did claim what you suggest, it wouldn't matter, since Joe Biden is not in charge of the international scientific community, and doesn't dictate what guidelines are recommended.
You would do a better job than Jen psuki covering for biden, maybe a change in employment would benefit you


Wrong. If the vaccines worked there would be fewer vaccinated people dying from covid! You can seriously spin everything to fit your biased non scientific agenda. You care about being right, virtue signaling, and shaming people who differ from your narrative. It makes you feel superior and feeds into your narcissistic need to feed your own ego. You are pompous, arrogant, and enjoy putting people down to prop yourself up as more intelligent and self righteous. Congratulations on placing yourself on a pedestal above others so you can look down on them. Disgusting.StringThing wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:25 pmBase rate fallacy, again.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:58 pm Covid data from the UK shows alarming numbers of covid hospitalizations and deaths in vaccinated population. The UK data is divided into unvaccinated and vaccinated (1,2 or 3 doses). The data shows that for age >18 the vaccinated are being hospitalized and dying at a much higher rate than unvaccinated.
What you posted does not show 'rate' or 'per capita'.
You should read the footnote in your own screenshot.
Realize vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are not distributed equally.
I hope this helps you to better understand why you are wrong.

Look, I'm just explaining what the footnote *in your own screenshot* was about. It's vital to comprehend the data you're reading. A higher number of vaccinated people dying from COVID *does not* mean that the vaccines don't work. If that's what you got from that raw data, you misinterpreted it.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:50 pmWrong. If the vaccines worked there would be fewer vaccinated people dying from covid! You can seriously spin everything to fit your biased non scientific agenda. You care about being right, virtue signaling, and shaming people who differ from your narrative. It makes you feel superior and feeds into your narcissistic need to feed your own ego. You are pompous, arrogant, and enjoy putting people down to prop yourself up as more intelligent and self righteous. Congratulations on placing yourself on a pedestal above others so you can look down on them. Disgusting.StringThing wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:25 pmBase rate fallacy, again.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 9:58 pm Covid data from the UK shows alarming numbers of covid hospitalizations and deaths in vaccinated population. The UK data is divided into unvaccinated and vaccinated (1,2 or 3 doses). The data shows that for age >18 the vaccinated are being hospitalized and dying at a much higher rate than unvaccinated.
What you posted does not show 'rate' or 'per capita'.
You should read the footnote in your own screenshot.
Realize vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are not distributed equally.
I hope this helps you to better understand why you are wrong.
The vaccines ARE HARMING people. You are on the wrong side of history! If your god Fauci and even “science” itself were personified and told you the vaccines are harmful you wouldn’t believe it. Enjoy the self delusion while it lasts. The truth that is self evident will always be revealed in the end.


In agreement with you on this statement!StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:05 pm
Look, I'm just explaining what the footnote *in your own screenshot* was about. It's vital to comprehend the data you're reading. A higher number of vaccinated people dying from COVID *does not* mean that the vaccines work.
This is the nicest thing you have ever said to me. Thank you, and you as well

So what would you call the vaccine mandates that caused many Americans to have to make the choice between taking an investigational covid injection -for which the clinical trials are still ongoing and for which we do not yet know the potential long term adverse consequences - or lose their jobs?StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:39 amPresidents do not 'set guidelines' for the public, though. Unless you are implying this would be some kind of executive order...CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:06 amSo it appears that biden will finally give a state of the union address where it is said that he'll announce some sort of 'victory' over covid and put in place new guidelines for the public to follow in the event of nuclear fallout...
Which will read something like.. "stay six feet apart and wear a face mask!"you literally can't make this shit up!!
And for the love of pete GET VACCINATED![]()

Maybe for the best but when someone says unvaccinated people are immoral, uncaring, and a danger to society that equals that of a drunk driver AND are fine if unvaccinated kill themselves that has crossed a line. Derogatory and disrespectful comments that degrade an entire group of people will be called out and defended.herbalhippie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:06 pm Ok, that's enough from everyone. Let's get this thread back on track, I don't want to have to lock it. Although hopefully the time is coming soon when we don't need it anymore.

I fixed the typo. It doesn't show it either way though... its just conglomerate data.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:31 pmIn agreement with you on this statement!StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:05 pm
Look, I'm just explaining what the footnote *in your own screenshot* was about. It's vital to comprehend the data you're reading. A higher number of vaccinated people dying from COVID *does not* mean that the vaccines work.
This is the nicest thing you have ever said to me. Thank you, and you as well

Uh, not a claim of victory?KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:36 pmSo what would you call the vaccine mandates that caused many Americans to have to make the choice between taking an investigational covid injection -for which the clinical trials are still ongoing and for which we do not yet know the potential long term adverse consequences - or lose their jobs?StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:39 amPresidents do not 'set guidelines' for the public, though. Unless you are implying this would be some kind of executive order...CatfatherB wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 11:06 amSo it appears that biden will finally give a state of the union address where it is said that he'll announce some sort of 'victory' over covid and put in place new guidelines for the public to follow in the event of nuclear fallout...
Which will read something like.. "stay six feet apart and wear a face mask!"you literally can't make this shit up!!
And for the love of pete GET VACCINATED![]()

Being faced with the consequences of your actions is not indicative of persecution. You are responsible for your actions, and your actions are hurting others.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:47 pmMaybe for the best but when someone says unvaccinated people are immoral, uncaring, and a danger to society that equals that of a drunk driver AND are fine if unvaccinated kill themselves that has crossed a line. Derogatory and disrespectful comments that degrade an entire group of people will be called out and defended.herbalhippie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:06 pm Ok, that's enough from everyone. Let's get this thread back on track, I don't want to have to lock it. Although hopefully the time is coming soon when we don't need it anymore.

No my actions are not hurting others. You are discriminating against people who choose a different medical decision than you do. Vaccinated are getting covid, spreading covid, being hospitalized and dying of covid. Your choice also has consequences. You have made the choice to degrinate an entire group of people because they don’t make the same medical choice you did. That’s disgusting and shamefulStringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 4:29 pmBeing faced with the consequences of your actions is not indicative of persecution. You are responsible for your actions, and your actions are hurting others.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:47 pmMaybe for the best but when someone says unvaccinated people are immoral, uncaring, and a danger to society that equals that of a drunk driver AND are fine if unvaccinated kill themselves that has crossed a line. Derogatory and disrespectful comments that degrade an entire group of people will be called out and defended.herbalhippie wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:06 pm Ok, that's enough from everyone. Let's get this thread back on track, I don't want to have to lock it. Although hopefully the time is coming soon when we don't need it anymore.

It's not 'discrimination 'when its a judgement of your actions. That's called an opinion. Am I discriminating against drunk drivers, when I say that drunk driving is dangerous? No. I am calling out a dangerous action for what it is. Being unvaccinated is not an unmutable characteristic. People are allowed to make judgements based on character.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 4:52 pmNo my actions are not hurting others. You are discriminating against people who choose a different medical decision than you do. Vaccinated are getting covid, spreading covid, being hospitalized and dying of covid. Your choice also has consequences. You have made the choice to degrinate an entire group of people because they don’t make the same medical choice you did. That’s disgusting and shamefulStringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 4:29 pmBeing faced with the consequences of your actions is not indicative of persecution. You are responsible for your actions, and your actions are hurting others.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:47 pm
Maybe for the best but when someone says unvaccinated people are immoral, uncaring, and a danger to society that equals that of a drunk driver AND are fine if unvaccinated kill themselves that has crossed a line. Derogatory and disrespectful comments that degrade an entire group of people will be called out and defended.

Consider the following-StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 3:05 pmLook, I'm just explaining what the footnote *in your own screenshot* was about. It's vital to comprehend the data you're reading. A higher number of vaccinated people dying from COVID *does not* mean that the vaccines don't work. If that's what you got from that raw data, you misinterpreted it.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 2:50 pmWrong. If the vaccines worked there would be fewer vaccinated people dying from covid! You can seriously spin everything to fit your biased non scientific agenda. You care about being right, virtue signaling, and shaming people who differ from your narrative. It makes you feel superior and feeds into your narcissistic need to feed your own ego. You are pompous, arrogant, and enjoy putting people down to prop yourself up as more intelligent and self righteous. Congratulations on placing yourself on a pedestal above others so you can look down on them. Disgusting.StringThing wrote: ↑Sun Feb 27, 2022 10:25 pm
Base rate fallacy, again.
What you posted does not show 'rate' or 'per capita'.
You should read the footnote in your own screenshot.
Realize vaccinated and unvaccinated populations are not distributed equally.
I hope this helps you to better understand why you are wrong.
The vaccines ARE HARMING people. You are on the wrong side of history! If your god Fauci and even “science” itself were personified and told you the vaccines are harmful you wouldn’t believe it. Enjoy the self delusion while it lasts. The truth that is self evident will always be revealed in the end.
Consider the following:
Urban populations live in higher density areas, where COVID is more likely to spread.
Urban populations are more left leaning than rural populations, and are thus more likely to get vaccinated.
Elderly are more likely to die of COVID, and are also more likely to be vaccinated.
There are studies which have accounted for these factors, and found that the vaccines do indeed work. That's why you can't take raw data like you posted, and come to a conclusion about the efficacy of vaccines.
Anyway, I'm going to go pray to Dr. Fauci. Have a wonderful day!



Lol that was an interesting way to try and Blitzkrieg-paint me as racist. Why are you bringing up race?KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:07 pm Consider the following-
You state that urban populations are more left leaning and thus more likely to get vaccinated. But are you aware that people of color are less likely to take the covid injection because they have a mistrust of the government and public Heath organizations because of the injustices done to them in the past under the guise of “health care”? Do you even know about the Tuskegee experiment? Do you even know the low vaccination rate of POC? I can’t recall the exact numbers but it’s somewhere between 30-40%. So by your judgement the 60-70% of POC who decline vaccination are immoral and uncaring? Nice. Great on you for passing judgement on a population of minorities who are hesitant because of past atrocities committed against them.
Elderly are more likely to die of covid so weren’t the vaccines supposed to “protect” them from hospitalizations and death? Yet the number of vaccinated elderly who are dying is far far higher than those unvaccinated.

I'd like to see the actual study so I can interpret the data for myself.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:13 pm Have you not seen the data from Israel showing an explosion of covid cases and deaths after the boosters? They are one of the most highly vaccinated countries in the world and have among some of the highest numbers of hospitalizations and death. Vaccine enhanced disease may be occurring which is what happened in the past corona virus vaccine animal studies. If this is the case, and it is looking likely, then the vaxxed are at higher risk of infection, hospitalizations and death. Which means they are more likely to catch and possibly also spread covid than the unvaxxed.


I mean, that's a very logical assessment of general vaccine study procedure, yes. I would think any researcher would agree with the things said here.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:40 pm Vaccine-enhanced disease: case studies and ethical implications for research and public health
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/a ... MC8250497/
Excerpt:
Vaccine-enhanced disease (VED) is a type of adverse event in which disease severity is increased when a person who has received the vaccine is later infected with the relevant pathogen.VED can occur during research with experimental vaccines and/or after vaccine licensure, sometimes months or years after a person receives a vaccine.Both research ethics and public health policy should therefore address the potential for disease enhancement. Significant VED has occurred in humans with vaccines for four pathogens: measles virus, respiratory syncytial virus, Staphylococcus aureus, and dengue virus;it has also occurred in veterinary research and in animal studies of human coronavirus vaccines
[Although rare, VED has important ethical implications because it can cause serious harm, including death, and such harms can undermine vaccine confidence more generally - leading to larger public health problems. The possibility of VED remains an important challenge for current and future vaccine development and deployment. We conclude this paper by summarising approaches to the reduction of risks and uncertainties related to VED, and the promotion of public trust in vaccines.

Do you actually listen to yourself? Or read what you post? I did not call you a racist. I did call you out for classifying a group of people who have a history of being marginalized and harmed as immoral and uncaring because they made a different medical decision than you. That’s on you. That’s your stance. Now own it.StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:38 pmLol that was an interesting way to try and Blitzkrieg-paint me as racist. Why are you bringing up race?KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:07 pm Consider the following-
You state that urban populations are more left leaning and thus more likely to get vaccinated. But are you aware that people of color are less likely to take the covid injection because they have a mistrust of the government and public Heath organizations because of the injustices done to them in the past under the guise of “health care”? Do you even know about the Tuskegee experiment? Do you even know the low vaccination rate of POC? I can’t recall the exact numbers but it’s somewhere between 30-40%. So by your judgement the 60-70% of POC who decline vaccination are immoral and uncaring? Nice. Great on you for passing judgement on a population of minorities who are hesitant because of past atrocities committed against them.
Elderly are more likely to die of covid so weren’t the vaccines supposed to “protect” them from hospitalizations and death? Yet the number of vaccinated elderly who are dying is far far higher than those unvaccinated.
Regardless of WHY someone mistrusts in the vaccine, they are wrong. They are ACTING immorally, whether through conscionable action or ignorance. Same as a drunk driver who thinks they aren't doing harm.
The vaccines do protect them from hospitalization and death. It's just not enough to entirely prevent it, and loses efficacy as time goes on.
Again, total hospitalization count is not indicative of vaccine efficacy. For this to be an accurate measure of vaccine efficacy, you would need a population that is 50/50 vaccinated, with an even population distribution, and an equal rate of exposure to the virus. That's not a realistic scenario, obviously. That's why there are studies which adjust for these variables. Studies which are confirmed as valid analyses on the international stage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy

This entire post is an emotional argument, not a logical one. I'm only interested in logical, fact based discussion. Thanks.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:58 pmDo you actually listen to yourself? Or read what you post? I did not call you a racist. I did call you out for classifying a group of people who have a history of being marginalized and harmed as immoral and uncaring because they made a different medical decision than you. That’s on you. That’s your stance. Now own it.StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:38 pmLol that was an interesting way to try and Blitzkrieg-paint me as racist. Why are you bringing up race?KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:07 pm Consider the following-
You state that urban populations are more left leaning and thus more likely to get vaccinated. But are you aware that people of color are less likely to take the covid injection because they have a mistrust of the government and public Heath organizations because of the injustices done to them in the past under the guise of “health care”? Do you even know about the Tuskegee experiment? Do you even know the low vaccination rate of POC? I can’t recall the exact numbers but it’s somewhere between 30-40%. So by your judgement the 60-70% of POC who decline vaccination are immoral and uncaring? Nice. Great on you for passing judgement on a population of minorities who are hesitant because of past atrocities committed against them.
Elderly are more likely to die of covid so weren’t the vaccines supposed to “protect” them from hospitalizations and death? Yet the number of vaccinated elderly who are dying is far far higher than those unvaccinated.
Regardless of WHY someone mistrusts in the vaccine, they are wrong. They are ACTING immorally, whether through conscionable action or ignorance. Same as a drunk driver who thinks they aren't doing harm.
The vaccines do protect them from hospitalization and death. It's just not enough to entirely prevent it, and loses efficacy as time goes on.
Again, total hospitalization count is not indicative of vaccine efficacy. For this to be an accurate measure of vaccine efficacy, you would need a population that is 50/50 vaccinated, with an even population distribution, and an equal rate of exposure to the virus. That's not a realistic scenario, obviously. That's why there are studies which adjust for these variables. Studies which are confirmed as valid analyses on the international stage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy
Mistrusting the vaccine is wrong? Tell that to the thousands of people harmed by these shots. Go ahead. Meet with them face to face and tell them their suffering was for the collective good of society. Meet each one of them and say that. I dare you.
Protect from hospitalization and death? Then why are vaccinated people dying by the thousands? Loses efficacy over time… so what’s next a lifetime subscription to big pharma’s money making injections? How many shots per year will we need? Are you aware all vaccines have adjuvants? Do you even know what an adjuvant is? Are you aware that there is increased risk for adverse events with each injection? What are we on now injection 3, 4 for some and this fall maybe number 5? For an illness with a 99.9% recovery rate for most age groups?
Don’t forget you flu shot … or you shingles shot. LOL


StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 6:12 pmThis entire post is an emotional argument, not a logical one. I'm only interested in logical, fact based discussion. Thanks.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:58 pmDo you actually listen to yourself? Or read what you post? I did not call you a racist. I did call you out for classifying a group of people who have a history of being marginalized and harmed as immoral and uncaring because they made a different medical decision than you. That’s on you. That’s your stance. Now own it.StringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:38 pm
Lol that was an interesting way to try and Blitzkrieg-paint me as racist. Why are you bringing up race?
Regardless of WHY someone mistrusts in the vaccine, they are wrong. They are ACTING immorally, whether through conscionable action or ignorance. Same as a drunk driver who thinks they aren't doing harm.
The vaccines do protect them from hospitalization and death. It's just not enough to entirely prevent it, and loses efficacy as time goes on.
Again, total hospitalization count is not indicative of vaccine efficacy. For this to be an accurate measure of vaccine efficacy, you would need a population that is 50/50 vaccinated, with an even population distribution, and an equal rate of exposure to the virus. That's not a realistic scenario, obviously. That's why there are studies which adjust for these variables. Studies which are confirmed as valid analyses on the international stage.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Base_rate_fallacy
Mistrusting the vaccine is wrong? Tell that to the thousands of people harmed by these shots. Go ahead. Meet with them face to face and tell them their suffering was for the collective good of society. Meet each one of them and say that. I dare you.
Protect from hospitalization and death? Then why are vaccinated people dying by the thousands? Loses efficacy over time… so what’s next a lifetime subscription to big pharma’s money making injections? How many shots per year will we need? Are you aware all vaccines have adjuvants? Do you even know what an adjuvant is? Are you aware that there is increased risk for adverse events with each injection? What are we on now injection 3, 4 for some and this fall maybe number 5? For an illness with a 99.9% recovery rate for most age groups?
Don’t forget you flu shot … or you shingles shot. LOL


This is also an emotional argument.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 6:18 pmStringThing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 6:12 pmThis entire post is an emotional argument, not a logical one. I'm only interested in logical, fact based discussion. Thanks.KalieGirl wrote: ↑Mon Feb 28, 2022 5:58 pm
Do you actually listen to yourself? Or read what you post? I did not call you a racist. I did call you out for classifying a group of people who have a history of being marginalized and harmed as immoral and uncaring because they made a different medical decision than you. That’s on you. That’s your stance. Now own it.
Mistrusting the vaccine is wrong? Tell that to the thousands of people harmed by these shots. Go ahead. Meet with them face to face and tell them their suffering was for the collective good of society. Meet each one of them and say that. I dare you.
Protect from hospitalization and death? Then why are vaccinated people dying by the thousands? Loses efficacy over time… so what’s next a lifetime subscription to big pharma’s money making injections? How many shots per year will we need? Are you aware all vaccines have adjuvants? Do you even know what an adjuvant is? Are you aware that there is increased risk for adverse events with each injection? What are we on now injection 3, 4 for some and this fall maybe number 5? For an illness with a 99.9% recovery rate for most age groups?
Don’t forget you flu shot … or you shingles shot. LOLRiiiiight. Logical. Fact based. When it serves and only when it serves your bias and need to degrinate others. Gotcha.




YOU LIVE IN HAWAII?!?IndelibleDotInk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 03, 2022 1:18 pm I am a big believer in getting vaxxed (for polio, if it were still going around, mmrm, tetanus, yearly flu, covid) so i got my booster shot a few days ago. My prior shots of moderna were both done last year april and may. Also took the flu shot at the same time, which I asked if it would be safe. (OK).
Took both in my left meaty shoulder, painless. But body felt something not right, more than any other vax. DISCLOSURE - I am on a weekish-long benzo test with tons of ativan throughout the day. So the ativan made me sleep and not eat, and the vax made me feel feverish dreams and just like minor general poo. Also my area under my left armpit was tender.
Now am back 100% minus being zonked from the ativan.
Would I get the vaxx again? Yes, but take a few weeks apart from the flu vax and not during a benzo test either. As everywhere returns to unmasking (Hawaii still has the mask, but we should be relaxing soon) please be safe. Can't make people take care of themselves, but working together that each may recover, we stand a greater chance of world health.
Like I mentioned earlier, Hawaii is gonna unmask soon, get your swimsuit and spend a few days in paradise!


