covid's relation to monkey pox?

[IndelibleDotInk]

any truth or rumor?

[herbalhippie]

None. No relation.

[IndelibleDotInk]

just bad timing?

[herbalhippie]

Very bad timing but what else would you expect for 2022??

[IndelibleDotInk]

more diseases released by state-sponsored laboratories designed to reduce the human population. Not that such a thing is necessarily bad, but people should at least be aware and have a fighting chance.

[IndelibleDotInk]

or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.

[herbalhippie]

Conspiracy theory.

[CatfatherB]

or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.

Look into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"

[mivanqua]

Seems like vaxxed + gay + promiscuous = monkeypox?

98% gay
2% children "in close proximity" (make of that what you will)

[HalcyonicFrankfurter]

Evil. EEEEEEEviiiiiiilllll
That's all.

But really, what's the chance that it happened so soon after covid? After deep research, it becomes clear that there are just way too many coincidental things. The 2030 agenda, wanting to reduce population, Bill G. buying up farmland.
Then there's the Alex Jones situation. I acknowledge he's crazy sometimes, but he was like the only guy talking about this stuff for years before it happened. Now he's on trial for mis-info on Sandy Hook despite there being no recent talk on it. I do not agree with him in this case, I'm just saying the topic was dead and it's a good excuse to destroy him. He's been wrong many times like this, but sometimes he says something true. I've always been curious whether he is insane or he's actually perfectly sane and he just mixes in a bunch of BS to enhance the show.

I feel hesitant to post cause this is just a kratom forum and I'm not looking for any hate. Love and understanding is so important in these times, so I respect any opinions. And I'm not down to argue about this - just putting it out there.

[Roofdog]

or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.

Look into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"

Look into Bill Gates and his father. They are straight up eugenisists. They dont hid it. And yes there is a much bigger agenda here. Its very slow moving but its moving. Thanks for you're post.

[iamlurkerpro]

I think the people that believe these conspiracy theories are way worse for the population than almost anything else. Monkey pox has been around for a long time, and has been raging in several African countries for years now. The US had like 20 million doses of the vaccine for it they let expire instead of giving to the countries with outbreaks. with world travel so easy anymore diseases will spread, and with people who think vaccines have direct connections to a NSA satellite putting out crazy theories in which a portion of humans want to believe be true wont take them, they will continue to spread. Monkeypox is not new and many other things that will continue to infect humans, it has been that way since the beginning. Vaccines have done so much to help humanity, that when an outbreak does happen there are surprised and scared and think the boogyman is trying to get them.

[FartBlaster]

There is none

[Roofdog]

I think the people that believe these conspiracy theories are way worse for the population than almost anything else. Monkey pox has been around for a long time, and has been raging in several African countries for years now. The US had like 20 million doses of the vaccine for it they let expire instead of giving to the countries with outbreaks. with world travel so easy anymore diseases will spread, and with people who think vaccines have direct connections to a NSA satellite putting out crazy theories in which a portion of humans want to believe be true wont take them, they will continue to spread. Monkeypox is not new and many other things that will continue to infect humans, it has been that way since the beginning. Vaccines have done so much to help humanity, that when an outbreak does happen there are surprised and scared and think the boogyman is trying to get them.

Where do you get your information from if you dont mind me asking?

[iamlurkerpro]

A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.

[herbalhippie]

A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving.

UPVOTE

[Roofdog]

A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.

The funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!

[iamlurkerpro]

A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.

The funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!

In the Us 6 corporations do own over 90% of the media, thats why NPR and BBC are such great resources. NPR is kinda self funded(they dont get anything from the Gov) and BBC runs off a tax on cable in england and abroad, so they really are not beholden to corp boards. That does go back to the 6 are 100% in it for profit. If there was any( and I mean any) chance the Gov was lying about covid they would go balls out to squeeze every penny out of exposing them. Blackrock and vanguard are not in the 6 Corp's that own 90% of the media companies in the US. Also the "Dr's" you referred to articles were probably not peer reviewed and thats why they were discredited. Its like commercials for toothpaste where they say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend this, theres always some that go against the grain,but that doesnt mean they are correct. In science if 9 out of 10 say the peer reviewed info to be correct, then as close to 100% as you can get that the 1 is wrong.

[IndelibleDotInk]

NPR is not news or arts.

[Roofdog]

A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.

The funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!

In the Us 6 corporations do own over 90% of the media, thats why NPR and BBC are such great resources. NPR is kinda self funded(they dont get anything from the Gov) and BBC runs off a tax on cable in england and abroad, so they really are not beholden to corp boards. That does go back to the 6 are 100% in it for profit. If there was any( and I mean any) chance the Gov was lying about covid they would go balls out to squeeze every penny out of exposing them. Blackrock and vanguard are not in the 6 Corp's that own 90% of the media companies in the US. Also the "Dr's" you referred to articles were probably not peer reviewed and thats why they were discredited. Its like commercials for toothpaste where they say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend this, theres always some that go against the grain,but that doesnt mean they are correct. In science if 9 out of 10 say the peer reviewed info to be correct, then as close to 100% as you can get that the 1 is wrong.

I have to disagree with your comment to Blackrock and Vanguard. They own just about everything. Just about all world money flows through these 2 companies. There was a chart done a while back showing how just about all money flows back to these 2. They own the companies that own the companies ect. Ect. For example, you buy coke or pepsi the money flows back to 1 of these 2. Its like that across the board. As far as the dr's and scientists go I am talking about the ones who have received rewards from the cdc, who, wef ect. Then once they spoke out these very organizations banned and discredited them. I dont believe anyone should be banned from any SM site. We should be able to recieve all information and make our own decisions. We aren't little kids we are intelligent adults that make life changing decisions everyday for our families. Just saw some headlines yesterday that the cdc is admitting they handled the pandemic incorrectly, i havent looked into this yet but i will over the weekend and see who said what. Thats pretty interesting. Good conversation thanks for engaging!!

[Loveandpeace]

A fairly large varity of places, NPR,BBC, Ny Times, and so many other's. I do not get any from Fox,facebook,youtube. It like in science, you hear a theory and read it, then find peer reviewed articles either proving or disproving. Like with Fox, almost 100% of their stories are only backed by the alex jones type outlet's, and most every other outlet in the world calls bs, so you can figure out the story is poo. Same goes with every outlet really, just fox being the worst, cnn has a story search for it and see if the other sources prove or disprove. Another great thing to do is if someone says "they researched" it themselves, most likely its total BS and at best its a 1/10 truth mixed with BS. Most news outlets only care about money, so if there is a story with validity they will all run it into the ground and try to get every penny out of it. Only watching/reading one or two places isnt good anymore,try as many as you can.

The funny thing is is that all of the major news we are fed....and yes they try to feed us the Bs, is all owned by 6 people who in turn are owned by either blackrock or vanguard (like everything else). I dont trust anything on any major tv networks. I think a lot of whats pumped out is meant to seperate us and cause divide. I read a lot of articles from accredited dr's, scientists, and people who were very esteemed by everyone until covid hit and they were discredited pretty quickly. We should be able to read both sides and make a decision for ourselves, but in this mess a lot of info was censored. That to me means there is something to hide. Again my opinion. Take care brother!

In the Us 6 corporations do own over 90% of the media, thats why NPR and BBC are such great resources. NPR is kinda self funded(they dont get anything from the Gov) and BBC runs off a tax on cable in england and abroad, so they really are not beholden to corp boards. That does go back to the 6 are 100% in it for profit. If there was any( and I mean any) chance the Gov was lying about covid they would go balls out to squeeze every penny out of exposing them. Blackrock and vanguard are not in the 6 Corp's that own 90% of the media companies in the US. Also the "Dr's" you referred to articles were probably not peer reviewed and thats why they were discredited. Its like commercials for toothpaste where they say 9 out of 10 doctors recommend this, theres always some that go against the grain,but that doesnt mean they are correct. In science if 9 out of 10 say the peer reviewed info to be correct, then as close to 100% as you can get that the 1 is wrong.

Whoa there buddy... Too. Much. Factual. Information. Your comment is sure to annoy some of the smooth brains around here. Just like every other corner of the internet... the painfully myopic and spectacularly ignorant preside here too.

Now watch the twist, turns and intentional non sequiturs run rampant. The only point you made was to check your sources, sadly a constant point that holds the most weight.

[iamlurkerpro]

https://www.reuters.com/article/factche ... SL2N2WI1K4
That is a fact check of some guy on instagram that started that trail of thought. They are not controlling shares of any company, they just have a vote(maybe millions of votes) but still just a vote.
I never said the CDC was exactly correct in anything, I said to browse a bunch of different sources and try to figure out what is fact and what is "bias".
With all do respect raising a family and doing normal thing's in no way prepares one to understand the intricate parts needed to map DNA and things like that. Thing's like pandemic's have so many information point's and actual scientific project's that need to be done, and that takes dozen's/hundred's/thousands of people who have dedicated their whole lives to study just one subject. That means a theory of one part of DNA might be the best information at that point and then the study goes into that direction,but can change when new information is available, and so on and so on. If we could understand the thing's that need to be understood about viruses/diseases to the point where our voice should be listened to, we would have a high paying Virologist job(which I'm not even close) or something along that line.
Again facebook,instagram,youtube, Fox and it's clones(the most bias and anti-factual 24/7 "news" sources),MSNBC are the worst place to "learn" fact's. Mix it up and try multiple sources of information that are not aligned together, thats going to be the best chance of getting the facts through all the BS.
I liken it to football fan's, I'm a Chicago Bears fan. Every year no matter how bad they did in the draft,or how bad the coaching has become, how many games they lose I still defend them to non bears fans and it doesnt matter if the bears suck,I'll still not listen to facts or anything because thats my tribe, my team. Thats what the political parties have done, theyve turned into into your team and not your team, and in politics that can never be a good thing.

[CatfatherB]

or i dunno... am tired. Is a one world government such a bad thing? I guess if it entails mass killing, it does.

Look into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"

Look into Bill Gates and his father. They are straight up eugenisists. They dont hid it. And yes there is a much bigger agenda here. Its very slow moving but its moving. Thanks for you're post.

https://anonymouswire.com/wef-declares- ... ty-of-you/
Yeah, they been publicly saying it openly for a long time now, they're not subtle about it anymore.

[Roofdog]

Look into the World Economic Forum and Klaus Schwab, agenda 2030. it's no secret, they openly state it. "You will own nothing and be happy". They're very much into "population control"

Look into Bill Gates and his father. They are straight up eugenisists. They dont hid it. And yes there is a much bigger agenda here. Its very slow moving but its moving. Thanks for you're post.

https://anonymouswire.com/wef-declares- ... ty-of-you/
Yeah, they been publicly saying it openly for a long time now, they're not subtle about it anymore.

You arent kidding. If you look where the Gates family money goes into, its eveything in healthcare if you can call it that anymore. Look into south Africa and India where he has tested his vaccines. Horrible things have happened to those people.