Ilikerafts wrote:I think TFH just has all the best and creative strain names and that's why his kratom is so good. "Hulu Kapuas" was so yesterday, "Wild Transformational Indian Hare Krishna Pyrenees Look at me Damien, It's all for you Meditation Maeng Da RSM-99" is so tomorrow. You guys hiring? Will work for food (leaf form only) (love the potential Syd Barrett reference too)
Haha, I wish creative kratom names were all you needed to do to have great kratom! Everyone knows that there is no industry standard that is reliable in the slightest, but internally we do have some kind of meaning. For example, below are a few of the ones we commonly use (please note these are very loosely defined.... some may vary).
Wild = Wild trees that share the land with our main plantation. Mature wild trees on private land like this are rare - because many times trees like this would have been used for lumber prior to the kratom industry booming.
30 Year Wild = Very old wild trees that share the land with our main plantation (we estimate the youngest @ around 30 years)
Wild Harvest = Wild trees that are on the perimeter of OR in a different location than our main source.
Wild Crafted = Wild trees that are outside our main source and part of the processing is done on-site of the harvest location.
TFH = A technique that we consider our "signature" process because to our knowledge, nobody else is doing it.
Deep Jungle = harvested in a location off the beaten path or along the river.
24k, Emerald, Jade, Sapphire, etc... = a technique is applied that only benefits the final product in a very specific condition. This technique is more expensive to execute (relatively) therefore we gave the "rich" names. This really started as a cute inside joke, but many folks have asked about it lately so there you go!
Again these are pretty loose definitions, I can think of examples that dont necessarily follow this completely.
When it comes to quality - none of the above descriptors are necessarily better than others. There may be some common threads, but I hesitate to share those because there are too many other variables to account for. I would advise that you dont sleep on the "simple" names as you might miss some real gems (for example, our latest batch of old fashioned "Green Hulu Kapuas" is a great batch... I am really starting to grow fond of it)
At the end of the day, body chemistry overrules all... I just can't stress this enough. I just pulled the last week's worth of data for the Wild Crafted Gold as an example. I trimmed out most of the info to keep it simple, all you need to know is the last number shown on each line is the "Overal Quality" score (based on a scale of 1-10)
1 = poor quality, little to no results
5 = average quality, what you can expect from most batches of kratom on the market
10 = Highest quality - the best of the best available.
2/26/2020 12:01:43 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 5
2/26/2020 6:00:00 wild crafted gold A6IR 6
2/25/2020 9:35:38 Wild Crafted Gold TFH - A6IR 8
2/24/2020 12:14:40 Wild Crafted Gold TFH-A6IR 7
2/23/2020 22:00:12 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 10
2/23/2020 17:20:00 Wild crafted gold A6IR 7
2/22/2020 9:54:12 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 5
2/22/2020 0:48:31 Wild Crafted Gold TFH-A6IR 9
2/21/2020 5:40:09 Wild Crafted Gold TFH-A6IR 10
2/21/2020 2:10:20 Wild Crafted Gold TFH-A6IR 2
2/20/2020 21:54:03 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 10
2/20/2020 11:25:21 Wild Crafted Gold TFH-A6IR 8
2/19/2020 23:21:34 wild crafted gold A6IR 9
2/19/2020 16:20:50 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 7
2/19/2020 11:43:45 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 10
2/19/2020 10:16:15 Wild Crafted Gold tfh - a6ir 8
2/19/2020 6:02:44 Wild Crafted Gold TFH - A6IR 7
2/19/2020 0:36:24 Wild Crafted Gold TFH - A6IR 9
2/18/2020 17:15:08 Wild Crafted Gold TFH - A6IR 10
2/16/2020 18:55:14 Wild Crafted Gold TFH-A6IR 9
2/16/2020 10:04:15 Wild Crafted Gold A61R 5
As you can see, opinions vary greatly and this is actually a pretty tame example. If you combine all scores it will average out to a 7.6, however, that score would be unbelievable for the person who rated it a "2". It is very rare to have a batch that everybody loves. Even some of our best batches ever have tough critics, especially when they are only testing a small sample.
This also applies when folks are identifying their "favorite" batches. I think a recent post that was started during our last event illustrates the variation of preference beautifully. (link below)
viewtopic.php?f=17&t=4162&hilit=favorite+tfh
As you can see, just about everyone has a different opinion. It seems like with many vendors there tends to be a few batches that stand out more often as peoples "favorites". However, for whatever reason, I feel like our "favorites" tend to be all over the place. I have no idea why that is. I'm curious if others see the same thing or if I am just seeing things because I spend too much time looking at batch data
Some batches seem to have a much higher standard deviation than others - our October batch of Red Bali #2 comes to mind. Some folks bought it by the kilo saying its wast he best kratom they have ever had, while others got absolutely nothing from it. Many Bentuangie batches also come to mind when I think of high polarization.
What is even more interesting, is we will occasionally do what we call "mirror testing". Mirror testing involves us giving two identical test samples under different names to the same tester. As you can imagine the results can vary greatly and only a small minority of folks are really consistent. Obviously the inconsistency can be the result of a variety of variables, but in some scenarios, we might use this information to assign a heavier/lighter weight to a specific testers' input.
Dont even get me started on human bias. 90% of the time folks will report that the "color" of the batch is whatever we label it. (even if they tested a "white" that was labeled as a "red").
